22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
no edit summary
: While I will be the first to admit I haven't made many substantive edits, I'm not a vandal by any stretch of the imagination. The quotes on the inaugural address page were hardly representative of the typical content of inaugural addresses, and left out at least two of the most recognizable phrases in American history. Additionally, my edits are not detrimental to the content of the article, nor do they take away from the conservative approach of this site. --[[User:DanC|DanC]] 20:11, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
: While I will be the first to admit I haven't made many substantive edits, I'm not a vandal by any stretch of the imagination. The quotes on the inaugural address page were hardly representative of the typical content of inaugural addresses, and left out at least two of the most recognizable phrases in American history. Additionally, my edits are not detrimental to the content of the article, nor do they take away from the conservative approach of this site. --[[User:DanC|DanC]] 20:11, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
::You can add more content to that page, just don't delete what is there. We like quotes mentioning God here.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:50, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
::You can add more content to that page, just don't delete what is there. We like quotes mentioning God here.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:50, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
:::I don't have any problem with quotes mentioning God. However, the quotes that were used were chosen not because of any significance, but simply because they mentioned God. In the context of the article, there are better and more appropriate quotes. --[[User:DanC|DanC]] 21:43, 1 April 2009 (EDT)