Changes

}}

}}

{{fa|Isaac Newton|

{{fa|Isaac Newton|hide=yes

:*Agree. Sizable article with detail about religious beliefs and scientific contributions. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:27, 1 March 2009 (EST)

:*Agree. Sizable article with detail about religious beliefs and scientific contributions. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:27, 1 March 2009 (EST)

:*Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS^talk]] 07:18, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

:*Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS^talk]] 07:18, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring.  Click the ''show'' link after each entry to see why it was rejected.

The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring.  Click the ''show'' link after each entry to see why it was rejected.

{{fa|Riemann integral|

{{fa|Riemann integral|hide=yes|

:*Agree. A math article with detailed explanation and examples. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:27, 1 March 2009 (EST)

:*Agree. A math article with detailed explanation and examples. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:27, 1 March 2009 (EST)

:*Disagree. It is certainly detailed, but seems to explain things at a fairly advanced level (but that is a non-math person speaking). Also, items that seem necessary for the proof (Square pyramidal numbers, etc) are redlinks. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]^{[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]} 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

:*Disagree. It is certainly detailed, but seems to explain things at a fairly advanced level (but that is a non-math person speaking). Also, items that seem necessary for the proof (Square pyramidal numbers, etc) are redlinks. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]^{[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]} 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

}}

}}

{{fa|A-7 Corsair II|

{{fa|A-7 Corsair II|hide=yes|

:*Disagree. Reads too much like a schematic. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:26, 12 March 2009 (EDT)

:*Disagree. Reads too much like a schematic. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:26, 12 March 2009 (EDT)

:*Disagree. Not a bad article per se, but not convinced it is worthy of front page. Maybe with an expansion of the history of the plane? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]^{[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]} 06:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

:*Disagree. Not a bad article per se, but not convinced it is worthy of front page. Maybe with an expansion of the history of the plane? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]^{[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]} 06:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

:*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS^talk]] 07:18, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

:*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS^talk]] 07:18, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

}}

}}

[[Category: Conservapedia Administration]]

[[Category: Conservapedia Administration]]