Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: − + Line 31:
Line 31: − +
World History Homework Nine - Model (view source)
Revision as of 01:11, April 6, 2009
, 01:11, April 6, 2009added two
3. The [[French Revolution]]: all bad, or was there something good about it?
3. The [[French Revolution]]: all bad, or was there something good about it?
:The French Revolution basically threw out a tyrannical form of government and replaced it with another—the Parisian mobs, and then Napoleon. France has never fully recovered from the anarchy of the Revolution days, but the Revolution was bound to happen sooner or later. Had the French had great, selfless leaders like George Washington and James Madison, their own revolution might have turned out better. (Duncan)
4. Pick another [[revolution]] and describe it.
4. Pick another [[revolution]] and describe it.
H3. The [[Louisiana Purchase]] was a "win-win" deal, meaning it was advantageous for both sides. Explain.
H3. The [[Louisiana Purchase]] was a "win-win" deal, meaning it was advantageous for both sides. Explain.
:The [[Louisiana Purchase]] was advantageous for both sides in that both America and France got something which they wanted and needed. France (led by Napoleon) got $15 million to fight in Europe with, which she desperately needed at the time, and America received 828,800 square miles of land for settlement. France had no use for the West of North America (it was too far and provided no resources) and the United States did. (Duncan)
H4. Comment on the theory or justification of a revolution, and what you think about it.
H4. Comment on the theory or justification of a revolution, and what you think about it.