Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,418
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 298:
Line 298: + + +
→Roehm and Hitler: no assumptions
::Sorry my friend, but I do not beleive you can provide a cite for what you just claimed above. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:58, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
::Sorry my friend, but I do not beleive you can provide a cite for what you just claimed above. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:58, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
*Rob, how many articles or papers have you found to back up your assumptions? --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 22:38, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
*Rob, how many articles or papers have you found to back up your assumptions? --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 22:38, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
:Assumptions? I haven't presented any assumptions. The one source we have reviewed thus far, [http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/lively.html Homosexuality and the Nazi Party] by Scott Lively states,
::''"Our review of '''more than 200 history texts''' written since the 1930s suggests that a pink swastika is equally representative, '''if not more so'''."
:I'm familiar with many, many of these texts. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:27, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
==Langer Report==
==Langer Report==