Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 272: Line 272:     
::: I suggest you revisit your premise of artificial equality.  Just saying that different languages/religions/composers are equal doesn't make it so.  At Conservapedia, we're not afraid to tell the truth.  I suggest you start welcoming the truth also, and set your mind free.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:55, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::: I suggest you revisit your premise of artificial equality.  Just saying that different languages/religions/composers are equal doesn't make it so.  At Conservapedia, we're not afraid to tell the truth.  I suggest you start welcoming the truth also, and set your mind free.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:55, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::: A composer's skill has nothing to do with national heritage.  All of a nation's history and culture is not inbred in a native of that country, otherwise America would be composed of George Washington clones, Italy of Caesar clones, and on and on.  According to your logic everyone in Germany should be on their 9th symphony.
 +
 +
:::: Also how do you claim that one language is superior to another?  Word order?  Number of words?  I have learned Spanish over many years and have found that many times conventions there (turning verbs into nouns, lack of helper verbs, lax use of gerunds, and very specific verb tenses) to be very useful, but othertimes illogical and useless.  For example if an action is being performed for a person (i.e. "I helped Shawn") you need a small word known as the "personal a" making the sentence "Yo ayudo a Shawn".  The "a" is usually used to denote "to" (as in "to a location" or "to a person").  Also in German one of my favorite words is "Schadenfreude" which has no exact word in English but has a very useful meaning (shameful joy, joy stemming from the misfortune of others).
 +
 +
::::Respectfully, --[[User:StevenB|StevenB]] 22:23, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
121

edits

Navigation menu