4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 167:
Line 167: +
Conservapedia:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 10:47, April 8, 2009
, 10:47, April 8, 2009→Proposed for featuring: voting
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. This is a superlative and positive-message essay. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 06:28, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. This is a superlative and positive-message essay. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 06:28, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Neutral. Like Jessica, I have mixed feelings. I think it's an interesting and well-argued premise and so I think it should be featured. However, I also feel featured articles should be mainspace and not essay space. Perhaps we could have a featured essay? Since there are fewer essays than articles, such a section would not have to be changed as frequently. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 06:47, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}