Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 322: Line 322:     
:::::Andy, it's unproductive to debate this issue with someone who won't even admit that languages can't be objectively quantified. If the person won't admit that, then they'll never admit, no matter how compelling the evidence is, that there are great composers of every nationality.--[[User:FredCorps|FredCorps]] 23:40, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:::::Andy, it's unproductive to debate this issue with someone who won't even admit that languages can't be objectively quantified. If the person won't admit that, then they'll never admit, no matter how compelling the evidence is, that there are great composers of every nationality.--[[User:FredCorps|FredCorps]] 23:40, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::: FredCorps, I appreciate your edits, but I respectfully disagree with your statement that "no language is superior to another."  Suppose I invent a new language today that has only ten words.  Is that equal to Latin?  No, I don't think so.  Suppose a tribal language is discovered on a Pacific Island containing less than a thousand people and no written work.  Is that language likely to be equal to Greek?  Of course not.  Indeed, not only is it implausible for all languages to be equal, but such equality is ''impossible''.  It is as impossible as claiming that all buildings are of equal height.  In fact, none are.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:47, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
    
*I couldn't give a "top ten" list of old composers (as opposed to "new" ones; Gershwin, Rogers & Hart, Zappa), but I can narrow my personal preferences to 20:
 
*I couldn't give a "top ten" list of old composers (as opposed to "new" ones; Gershwin, Rogers & Hart, Zappa), but I can narrow my personal preferences to 20:
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu