Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 296: Line 296:     
This seems more of an inquisition, than an intellectual dialog, ClementB. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:01, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 
This seems more of an inquisition, than an intellectual dialog, ClementB. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:01, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
=== No One Expects the Spanish Inquisition ==
    
:I beg to differ: Granted, it is a little bit inquisitive to be asked
 
:I beg to differ: Granted, it is a little bit inquisitive to be asked
Line 344: Line 346:     
::::::::::: Yes, superior overall.  The English language of 2009 is superior overall to the English language of 1000.  Really.  Also, a language having a larger vocabulary, a richer history, more connection with writing and development, is going to be a superior language to one developed by just a few thousand people a few hundred years ago on an isolated island.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:54, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::::::::::: Yes, superior overall.  The English language of 2009 is superior overall to the English language of 1000.  Really.  Also, a language having a larger vocabulary, a richer history, more connection with writing and development, is going to be a superior language to one developed by just a few thousand people a few hundred years ago on an isolated island.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:54, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::::::::: The language developed by this people may fit their needs better than the English language. And in the English of 1000 you'll find words for things which are lost today, as we don't need them any longer. Just having a greater vocabulary doesn't make a language superior, I'd say, it could be just a sign of decadence. [[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 18:09, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
    
=== Top 20 Composers ===
 
=== Top 20 Composers ===
178

edits

Navigation menu