Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Head of Church of England
Line 392: Line 392:  
::::You lost me there. When did precision become a liberal value? Especially on an encyclopedia, where you'd expect a certain sticking to the facts, and an exact language? And A. Schlafly made it clear in his first reply on this topic that he was talking about ''nations'' and ''nationalities''. So, it's  ''German'' and not  ''Germanic'' - or even, ''having a German sounding family name''.
 
::::You lost me there. When did precision become a liberal value? Especially on an encyclopedia, where you'd expect a certain sticking to the facts, and an exact language? And A. Schlafly made it clear in his first reply on this topic that he was talking about ''nations'' and ''nationalities''. So, it's  ''German'' and not  ''Germanic'' - or even, ''having a German sounding family name''.
 
::::Or do you just want to annoy your Austrians relatives?
 
::::Or do you just want to annoy your Austrians relatives?
−
::::[[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 07:56, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
+
::::[[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 07:56, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== English King/Anti-Catholic Laws ==
 +
 +
:Mr. Schlafly, I'm glad you kept the info on the Anglican/ Episcopal Church fact! But I'm a tad curious why you reverted the bit about the English King being the head of the Anglican Church. Officially the English monarch has been the head of the Church of England since Henry VIII established it. The reasons there are laws restricitng a Catholic royal is to ensure that he can become King and fufill his duty as head of the Church. Maybe we could try a different wording? I could find refernces if you prefer! Thank you --[[User:IScott|IScott]] 16:16, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
597

edits

Navigation menu