Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
4,575
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
→More definitive: Agree
I also looked in the MGG (The German equivalent of Grove's), which stated simply that the concert etude was "minted" (prägen) with the publication of Chopin's op. 10. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 07:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
I also looked in the MGG (The German equivalent of Grove's), which stated simply that the concert etude was "minted" (prägen) with the publication of Chopin's op. 10. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 07:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
I have no problems with the revision. I actually managed to get to my own library yesterday - everywhere I looked there was a vagueness (and I don't just mean the librarians) about these early Liszt pieces. I was going to come on here this morning and say that it seems to hinge on the young Franz's ''intentions''. Did he mean them ''solely'' as practice or teaching pieces (didactic is too arcane a word at this hour of the morning) or did he also have public performance in mind. He may only have been in his mid-teens but Liszt was Liszt and was probably already the showman. That's all. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 17:56, 9 April 2009 (EDT)