Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 399: Line 399:     
For example (in purely alphabetical order):
 
For example (in purely alphabetical order):
−
Bartok (Hungary)
+
*Bartok (Hungary)
−
Britten (UK)
+
*Britten (UK)
−
Ellington (USA)
+
*Ellington (USA)
−
Mahler (Czech Republic)
+
*Mahler (Czech Republic)
−
Prokofiev (Russia)
+
*Prokofiev (Russia)
−
Puccini (Italy)
+
*Puccini (Italy)
−
Ravi Shankar (India)
+
*Ravi Shankar (India)
−
Schoenberg (Austria)
+
*Schoenberg (Austria)
−
Shostakovich (Russia)
+
*Shostakovich (Russia)
−
Stravinsky (Russia)
+
*Stravinsky (Russia)
−
[[User:JosephMac|JosephMac]] 12:26, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
+
 
 +
[[User:JosephMac|JosephMac]] 12:27, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
    
== English King/Anti-Catholic Laws ==
 
== English King/Anti-Catholic Laws ==
 
   
 
   
 
:Mr. Schlafly, I'm glad you kept the info on the Anglican/ Episcopal Church fact! But I'm a tad curious why you reverted the bit about the English King being the head of the Anglican Church. Officially the English monarch has been the head of the Church of England since Henry VIII established it. The reasons there are laws restricitng a Catholic royal is to ensure that he can become King and fufill his duty as head of the Church. Maybe we could try a different wording? I could find refernces if you prefer! Thank you --[[User:IScott|IScott]] 16:16, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:Mr. Schlafly, I'm glad you kept the info on the Anglican/ Episcopal Church fact! But I'm a tad curious why you reverted the bit about the English King being the head of the Anglican Church. Officially the English monarch has been the head of the Church of England since Henry VIII established it. The reasons there are laws restricitng a Catholic royal is to ensure that he can become King and fufill his duty as head of the Church. Maybe we could try a different wording? I could find refernces if you prefer! Thank you --[[User:IScott|IScott]] 16:16, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
104

edits

Navigation menu