Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Incompleteness and God: Onthological proof
Line 15: Line 15:     
Incompleteness is sometimes used to refute the existence of an [[omnipotent]] god: If God were omnipotent, he would act as an [[oracle]] (in the mathematical sense) for any mathematical theory. That is, he could decide for any statement S whether S or not-S were true, which contradicts incompleteness. This argument is a more formal version of the "Can God make a rock even He could not move" [[paradox]].
 
Incompleteness is sometimes used to refute the existence of an [[omnipotent]] god: If God were omnipotent, he would act as an [[oracle]] (in the mathematical sense) for any mathematical theory. That is, he could decide for any statement S whether S or not-S were true, which contradicts incompleteness. This argument is a more formal version of the "Can God make a rock even He could not move" [[paradox]].
 +
 +
On the other hand, the same Godel that formulated the Incompleteness Theorems used those same tools ([[Model Theory]]) to forge an onthological proof of God's existence.<ref>[http://www.scar.utoronto.ca/~sobel/OnL_T/OnGodel(toKoons).pdf Godel's Onthological Proof that God exists]</ref>
    
[[Category:Logic]][[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Logic]][[Category:Mathematics]]
SkipCaptcha
175

edits

Navigation menu