19,576
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 106:
Line 106: − − == Current article == − Line 116:
Line 113: + + + + + + + + + + Line 127:
Line 134: − {{fa|Prime number| − :* Agree. Probably the most exemplary article on how to pitch math at multiple levels of understanding. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:32, 12 March 2009 (EDT) − :* Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT) − :* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:46, 30 March 2009 (EDT) − :* Agree. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 2 April 2009 (EDT) − }}
Conservapedia:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 00:25, April 19, 2009
, 00:25, April 19, 2009no edit summary
:* Agree tentatively, although would it be possible to expand more on the artist's life? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree tentatively, although would it be possible to expand more on the artist's life? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}
{{fa|Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America|
{{fa|Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America|
:* Disagree. (''It is a very good article, well written and reasoned. My primary concern, looking at it within the context of the featured article is that it is more of an "opinion piece" and I felt that on those grounds it did not really suit my criteria for a "featured article". Where I do think it could be used, would be under the mainpage's "Highlighted article", which would mean that not only could it be featured for longer, but would be more in line with the aims of that section.'')--[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. (''It is a very good article, well written and reasoned. My primary concern, looking at it within the context of the featured article is that it is more of an "opinion piece" and I felt that on those grounds it did not really suit my criteria for a "featured article". Where I do think it could be used, would be under the mainpage's "Highlighted article", which would mean that not only could it be featured for longer, but would be more in line with the aims of that section.'')--[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. Excellent proposal. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:35, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. Excellent proposal. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:35, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}
== Current article ==
{{fa|Prime number|
:* Agree. Probably the most exemplary article on how to pitch math at multiple levels of understanding. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:32, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:46, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
== Future articles ==
== Future articles ==
'''New suggestions can be added at the ''end'' of this list.'''
'''New suggestions can be added at the ''end'' of this list.'''
{{fa|Pat Tillman|
{{fa|Pat Tillman|