Changes

:The enormous political and atheistic motivations for promoting evolution mean that deceit has been and will be repeatedly used to push the theory.  I spent several years wading through it and personally concluded there is no germ of truth there.  You're welcome to undertake that task and draw your own conclusions.

:The enormous political and atheistic motivations for promoting evolution mean that deceit has been and will be repeatedly used to push the theory.  I spent several years wading through it and personally concluded there is no germ of truth there.  You're welcome to undertake that task and draw your own conclusions.

:Merely one [[Counterexample to Evolution]] disproves the theory.  I see about two dozen.  Also, the notion of God-directed evolution contradicts two of the most fundamental tenets of Christianity:  that man was created in God's image, and that Christ redeemed the sign of Adam.  The [[Humanis Generis]] even forbids the teaching of evolution as it is commonly understood.

:Merely one [[Counterexample to Evolution]] disproves the theory.  I see about two dozen.  Also, the notion of God-directed evolution contradicts two of the most fundamental tenets of Christianity:  that man was created in God's image, and that Christ redeemed the sin of Adam.  The [[Humani Generis]] even forbids the teaching of evolution as it is commonly understood.

:The bottom line for me is that the [[theory of evolution]] is one (of many) deceitful attempts to weaken Christian [[faith]].  The theory is a ticket to the falsehood and despondency of atheism for most people.

:The bottom line for me is that the [[theory of evolution]] is one (of many) deceitful attempts to weaken Christian [[faith]].  The theory of evolution is a ticket to the falsehood and despondency of atheism for most people.

:Superb effort in your answers with two models!  Feel free to discuss any of my comments on the talk page for this work.  Score: 100/100.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:50, 19 April 2009 (EDT)

:Superb effort in your answers with two models!  Feel free to discuss any of my comments on the talk page for this work.  Score: 100/100.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:50, 19 April 2009 (EDT)

[[Category:World History lectures]]

[[Category:World History lectures]]