Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 68: Line 68:     
:Pauli did not use it, in the quote you supply, to make historical claims. I maintain my promise of ten for ten, and I caution you against attacking the conservative worldview by prevaricating on what "historical" means. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 15:21, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
 
:Pauli did not use it, in the quote you supply, to make historical claims. I maintain my promise of ten for ten, and I caution you against attacking the conservative worldview by prevaricating on what "historical" means. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 15:21, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I stated above that I won't touch the ''historical'' aspects of the lecture, but only the ''scientific'' ones. So, I  rectified or - if you prefer - improved a scientific statement. That has  nothing to do with a certain  ''Weltanschauung'', that's just a question whether a  formulation is used in physics or not.
 +
::I think that Aschlafly will accept a formulation which is similar to the one used at Conservapedia's article on the [[Theory of Relativity]].
 +
::[[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 15:55, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
178

edits

Navigation menu