Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply re: evolution
Line 16: Line 16:     
::Also, as far as I know, at least the Catholic Church does not require belief in a young earth. So when you combine old earth and the teachings of Humani Generis, is there anything wrong or deceiful about that? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 18:19, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::Also, as far as I know, at least the Catholic Church does not require belief in a young earth. So when you combine old earth and the teachings of Humani Generis, is there anything wrong or deceiful about that? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 18:19, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Was there a Great Flood as cited by Jesus?  Was there one Adam and one Eve as required by Christ's suffering, and emphasized by ''Humani Generis''?  The modern theory of evolution, naturalistic or theistic, is irreconcilable with each.
 +
 +
:::I reject the theory of evolution for the same reason I rejected life in outer space (when that was widely accepted by scientists) and global warming (which is widely promoted today):  it's junk science, falsehoods promoted for political reasons.  It has many flaws and makes no sense. 
 +
 +
:::Could someone insist that theistic evolution occurred in an illogical way?  It doesn't take long to ask specific questions about theistic evolution to see the flaws in it.  For example, evolution depends on populations evolving.  Was there one Adam or not, and how long ago did he live under theistic evolution?  Was Adam created in God's image, or in animals' image?  I'd be surprised if anyone can give you a straight answer to such obvious and simple questions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:41, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,393

edits

Navigation menu