Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
12 bytes removed ,  14:56, April 22, 2009
Line 4: Line 4:  
Hi, I have recently been appointed the chief bureaucrat of Conservapedia. I have seen that your edits are liberal crap and I ask you to stop. I need your password, which will only be shared between me and other site owners, to block your account if you continue to make factually incorrect edits so I do not have to block your IP range to this website so other people can contribute. If you stop vandalizing I  will not block you. Please reply to this message ASAP. [[User:JamesY|JamesY]] 10:16, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
 
Hi, I have recently been appointed the chief bureaucrat of Conservapedia. I have seen that your edits are liberal crap and I ask you to stop. I need your password, which will only be shared between me and other site owners, to block your account if you continue to make factually incorrect edits so I do not have to block your IP range to this website so other people can contribute. If you stop vandalizing I  will not block you. Please reply to this message ASAP. [[User:JamesY|JamesY]] 10:16, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
   −
== Response ==
+
 
 
:Hello JamesY,
 
:Hello JamesY,
 
       I must say, I rather resent the deletion of my comments, which are well substantiated within the scientific literature and elsewhere. If you could please explain the partisan nature of what you have summarily deleted I would greatly appreciate it as I see no inherent "liberal" bias in them. In fact, I am quite moderate in my political take and have few leanings one way of the other. It was my understanding that the "talk" pages were designed for intellectual conversation and queries, which was my intent. My search for reconciliation between religion and science has been quite a journey, as I started every bit as resentful of evolution as many here are. Fortunately, I was allowed tutelage under some of the greatest evolutionary theists alive today (Francis Collins, former director of the Human Genome Research Institute, Ken Miller, biochemist at Brown University, author and expert witness in the 2005 Dover Trial and Owen Gingerich, professor emeritus of astronomy and the history of science at Harvard University) and have come to see that science and Christianity need not be in conflict. My intent in the "talk" section was to explore this idea in a civil discussion, though it appears that is "liberal crap" and "prohibited". As a scientist, I can see little benefit in the continued misunderstanding of science or religion since this inevitably leads to conflict.  
 
       I must say, I rather resent the deletion of my comments, which are well substantiated within the scientific literature and elsewhere. If you could please explain the partisan nature of what you have summarily deleted I would greatly appreciate it as I see no inherent "liberal" bias in them. In fact, I am quite moderate in my political take and have few leanings one way of the other. It was my understanding that the "talk" pages were designed for intellectual conversation and queries, which was my intent. My search for reconciliation between religion and science has been quite a journey, as I started every bit as resentful of evolution as many here are. Fortunately, I was allowed tutelage under some of the greatest evolutionary theists alive today (Francis Collins, former director of the Human Genome Research Institute, Ken Miller, biochemist at Brown University, author and expert witness in the 2005 Dover Trial and Owen Gingerich, professor emeritus of astronomy and the history of science at Harvard University) and have come to see that science and Christianity need not be in conflict. My intent in the "talk" section was to explore this idea in a civil discussion, though it appears that is "liberal crap" and "prohibited". As a scientist, I can see little benefit in the continued misunderstanding of science or religion since this inevitably leads to conflict.  
Line 11: Line 11:  
RLSOchem
 
RLSOchem
   −
:I am a worthless troll. Please ignore, sorry. [[User:JamesY|JamesY]] 10:50, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
+
::I am a worthless troll. Please ignore, sorry. [[User:JamesY|JamesY]] 10:50, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
   −
::I am a bit confused by this statement ... was there a misunderstanding that resulted in deletion of my comments?
+
:::I am a bit confused by this statement ... was there a misunderstanding that resulted in deletion of my comments?
23

edits

Navigation menu