Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 634:
Line 634: − − == Thank You == − − Thanks all for the entertainment value. This place is a LOT funnier than Uncyclopedia. Well, apart from that PaulLaroque, who doesn't seem to realise that it's all a spoof − − It IS all a spoof, isn't it? [[User:HieronymousCrowley|HieronymousCrowley]] 14:54, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 18:55, April 23, 2009
, 18:55, April 23, 2009Reverted edits by HieronymousCrowley (Talk) to last version by LPowell
I believe these have been discussed on this talk page before, and settled after input from [[User:Aschlafly]]. In particular, I think it has been exposed that Snopes has been bit gullible in the past when it comes to liberal deceit. As far as the other two items go, though they are not convincing in a vacuum, we must consider them in context of all the other evidence. See the two or three talk page sections above this one, or the talk archives, for more discussion on this. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 01:10, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
I believe these have been discussed on this talk page before, and settled after input from [[User:Aschlafly]]. In particular, I think it has been exposed that Snopes has been bit gullible in the past when it comes to liberal deceit. As far as the other two items go, though they are not convincing in a vacuum, we must consider them in context of all the other evidence. See the two or three talk page sections above this one, or the talk archives, for more discussion on this. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 01:10, 22 April 2009 (EDT)