34
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 57:
Line 57: +
Talk:Homosexuality and Genetics (view source)
Revision as of 00:21, April 24, 2009
, 00:21, April 24, 2009no edit summary
::::The NARTH article does nothing but support the position of this wiki in a way that liberals are unable to deny. It not only quotes the head of the human genome project, who is more qualified than anyone else to make these claims, it also cites specific studies that support its conclusion that genetics have a minor influence on homosexuality, which can be easily overcome with [[Essay:Quantifying_Mental_Strength|mental strength]]. You are undermining the quality of this encyclopedia by removing vital proof of its positions, and leaving it vulnerable to liberal [[deceit]]. Yours in Christ, --[[User:JWeatherman|JWeatherman]] 20:18, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
::::The NARTH article does nothing but support the position of this wiki in a way that liberals are unable to deny. It not only quotes the head of the human genome project, who is more qualified than anyone else to make these claims, it also cites specific studies that support its conclusion that genetics have a minor influence on homosexuality, which can be easily overcome with [[Essay:Quantifying_Mental_Strength|mental strength]]. You are undermining the quality of this encyclopedia by removing vital proof of its positions, and leaving it vulnerable to liberal [[deceit]]. Yours in Christ, --[[User:JWeatherman|JWeatherman]] 20:18, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
:::::P.S. it is spelled "embrace." Please sign your comment as well, I was not aware that I was responding to you until I checked the edit history, Conservative. At first I thought it was a liberal parodist and responded perhaps too harshly. I apologize if I have offended you in any way. Yours in Christ, --[[User:JWeatherman|JWeatherman]] 20:21, 23 April 2009 (EDT)