Reverted edits by JHamm (Talk) to last version by TK
Line 1:
Line 1:
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
−
−
==Changed ''forever''?==
−
To say that Jesus changed the world forever would seem to be a very poetic way of putting it. No one can claim to know the future, which seems to be what we're doing here, unless, of course, we're claiming that ALL people and events have changed the world forever (I doubt this is the message being sent). A main theme of Conservapedia is the assault against Christianity, religion and the attempts of lib-progs to install secular fascism. If that trend continued to it's (il)logical, extreme conclusion, wouldn't that change be negated, or at least, rendered provisory? I guess a good way of putting it is that in an encyclopedia, no matter how reverence the authors lump onto a particular article, it is inappropriate to let that reverence intrude on the content.
−
−
For example: The compilers of the Merriam-Webster's dictionary clearly have an affinity for language, but does that mean that their article on "language" should read: "Language is the lifeblood of all entities, without which all perception would wither out of meaning?" Just because the article pertains to the author's lives (or even the audiences lives), it seems downright unprofessional to attribute unprovable facts to topics, with zero evidence beyond personal ideals. [[User:JHamm|- JHamm]] 00:43, 25 April 2009 (EDT)