2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 86:
Line 86: + + +
Debate:Is Romeo and Juliet appropriate? (view source)
Revision as of 20:14, April 25, 2009
, 20:14, April 25, 2009→Related thoughts
The Bible sayes that Jesus had brothers and sisters in John 2:12, and other passages. There is no question; Mary did not remain a virgin. I think Rutm makes an extremly valuable point in comparing the scripture to R&J. Society changes; thats clear: Adam's children married each other. That was because society was (obviously!) different then. Thirteen year-olds could be married for much of human history. Society's different now, and I think mature students can learn about other societies. --StevenM 17:02, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
The Bible sayes that Jesus had brothers and sisters in John 2:12, and other passages. There is no question; Mary did not remain a virgin. I think Rutm makes an extremly valuable point in comparing the scripture to R&J. Society changes; thats clear: Adam's children married each other. That was because society was (obviously!) different then. Thirteen year-olds could be married for much of human history. Society's different now, and I think mature students can learn about other societies. --StevenM 17:02, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
I beg to differ. It is well known that the word for brothers and cousins was the same word. As a devout Roman Catholic I see plentiful evidence that the Blessed Virgin Mary was perpetually virgin. Moreover, the arguments put forth to the contrary have been roundly debunked over the last 2000 years. --[[User:Johnstosh|Johnstosh]] 16:14, 25 April 2009 (EDT)
[[category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[category:Conservapedia Debates]]