Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 133:
Line 133: − − == I just don't see the point of this. == − − I don't understand why you want to promote limitations to personal freedom so much? Paticularly in areas which remain in the personal domain (homosexuality, religioous choice.) − − A lot of this website is slanted towards christian outlooks rather than conservative ones, and to be frank traditional dogma is all the product of temporal men like me and you, why were they more right than anyone else? (we'll ignore the bible because I guess that's where faith comes into play, but anyway most of the lifestyl and structural choices, like no female catholic priests for instance, are just exegesis anyway.) − − Perhaps financial conservativism makes sense sometimes, but this website seems more like christianapedia, which undermines it's goal and makes it sound like a ranting fanatic in the corner.
Conservapedia talk:Debate Topics (view source)
Revision as of 19:27, April 27, 2009
, 19:27, April 27, 2009Reverted edits by Bleepysynth (Talk) to last version by Gao
[[REquest to add Debate Topic: Faith or Morality: Which is more important?]]
[[REquest to add Debate Topic: Faith or Morality: Which is more important?]]