Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 63: Line 63:     
::Andy I think that you have entirely missed his point.  Clement sought to draw a distinction between the status of colony and that of dominion.  He didn't say that Canada was independent.  I think his point was that Canada was more properly referred to as a dominion at the time.  Whether that is a distinction of any significance I don't know.  I note that he referred to the issue as a subtlety and said that he did not wish to raise the point.  Obviously the far more significant issue for him was the characterisation of Russia's post-war situation.  --[[User:EdmundB|EdmundB]] 19:41, 27 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::Andy I think that you have entirely missed his point.  Clement sought to draw a distinction between the status of colony and that of dominion.  He didn't say that Canada was independent.  I think his point was that Canada was more properly referred to as a dominion at the time.  Whether that is a distinction of any significance I don't know.  I note that he referred to the issue as a subtlety and said that he did not wish to raise the point.  Obviously the far more significant issue for him was the characterisation of Russia's post-war situation.  --[[User:EdmundB|EdmundB]] 19:41, 27 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Well, clearly Canada's legal status, during World War I was that of a colony, and by 1931 it was considered autonomous with the Balfour resolution being implemented.  It is too picky to quibble over public perceptions, rather than the information I gave above, detailing the legal definition, and that is it was certainly not an autonomous dominion prior to 1930. If not that, it was a colony, and by any other name, it still was one. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:08, 27 April 2009 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu