nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 339:
Line 339: +
→Langer Report
*Nevertheless, it was my response. I did not mean personal offense, and am sorry you took some. The insistence of being right, and everyone else wrong is not scholarly. The conclusions you have taken, and the leaps of logic you espouse, are not warranted by the little information out there, which is why your conclusion has been rejected by 90% of all historians and scholars who have spent lifetimes specializing in the study of Hitler and the Nazi's. I am not seeking confrontation with someone whose work I have come to admire. You can always email me, since you have it, rather than continue the Wiki dialog way, which I am not schooled in, nor comfortable with. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 22:05, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
*Nevertheless, it was my response. I did not mean personal offense, and am sorry you took some. The insistence of being right, and everyone else wrong is not scholarly. The conclusions you have taken, and the leaps of logic you espouse, are not warranted by the little information out there, which is why your conclusion has been rejected by 90% of all historians and scholars who have spent lifetimes specializing in the study of Hitler and the Nazi's. I am not seeking confrontation with someone whose work I have come to admire. You can always email me, since you have it, rather than continue the Wiki dialog way, which I am not schooled in, nor comfortable with. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 22:05, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
::You've said it twice, and offered no evidence for the conclusion. "conclusion has been rejected by 90% of all historians and scholars who have spent lifetimes specializing in the study of Hitler and the Nazi's." Count me among that number. In the later 80s I was focused on Soviet history. Since 1991 Islamic & Chinese subjects. Since the wiki era, however, I was asked to reaxamine Comintern activities & the Venona project, which has brough me back into those decades, the 1930s & 40s. And like riding a bicycle, it's no problem fro me to pick up Ernst Roehm once again 1919 or 1921. I know the character well. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:13, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
::You've said it twice, and offered no evidence for the conclusion. "conclusion has been rejected by 90% of all historians and scholars who have spent lifetimes specializing in the study of Hitler and the Nazi's." Count me among that number. In the later 80s I was focused on Soviet history. Since 1991 Islamic & Chinese subjects. Since the wiki era, however, I was asked to reaxamine Comintern activities & the Venona project, which has brough me back into those decades, the 1930s & 40s. And like riding a bicycle, it's no problem fro me to pick up Ernst Roehm once again 1919 or 1921. I know the character well. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:13, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
*I do not subscribe to the theory that Gay activists use to promote their cause. I do not subscribe to the theory that the Nazi's were advancing some homosexual plan to take vengeance. There is a most unscholarly trend these days to try and deconstruct history to knock the pillars out from things Liberals and Evolutionists use to support their modern day babble, and that is certainly one thing that alarms me. The motivations of each individual player in that sick tableau we commonly refer to as "the Nazi's" are many and varied. I still continue to believe that much of this material doesn't belong on this page. It more rightfully should be on the Nazi entry. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 22:36, 25 March 2007 (EDT)