Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes added ,  04:26, May 2, 2009
Line 57: Line 57:  
I think omnipotence would surely just remove the creation’s entire being, since the corruption is in the very nature of it.  How about purifying rather than destroying?  That means the creator would have to protect the creation in some way, correcting instead of removing.
 
I think omnipotence would surely just remove the creation’s entire being, since the corruption is in the very nature of it.  How about purifying rather than destroying?  That means the creator would have to protect the creation in some way, correcting instead of removing.
   −
<big>''Had to Have Known''</big>
+
<big>'''Had to Have Known'''</big>
    
If a creation had to know of the deity to properly glorify it, someone would have had to have known?  Would that be where it ended?  No, because the challenge to properly glorify the good deity is ongoing with our presence.  There should be some evidence that a person had the ability to go search for, even if it was crossing the sea and going through the desert to find it.  It should be available today as well, especially since exploration and communication have developed.
 
If a creation had to know of the deity to properly glorify it, someone would have had to have known?  Would that be where it ended?  No, because the challenge to properly glorify the good deity is ongoing with our presence.  There should be some evidence that a person had the ability to go search for, even if it was crossing the sea and going through the desert to find it.  It should be available today as well, especially since exploration and communication have developed.
119

edits

Navigation menu