2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 363:
Line 363: + +
→Isolationist vs Interventionalists
::::Looking at the discussion, you'll see the qualifications: "indeed is not even ideological or a way of thinking; it refers to behavior...etc.", and "looking at the pure politics of the matter" where I go onto cite both major parties by name. So the objection you state above could legitimately be refered to as a "non-responsive response". [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:31, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Looking at the discussion, you'll see the qualifications: "indeed is not even ideological or a way of thinking; it refers to behavior...etc.", and "looking at the pure politics of the matter" where I go onto cite both major parties by name. So the objection you state above could legitimately be refered to as a "non-responsive response". [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:31, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
::: Exactly as you say [User:RobS|RobS: the democratic party is diveded on this issue. So don't put in the definition of liberal (which isn't the same as democrat, but lets forget about that for a sec) that they all oppose/support a certain policy, because they don't actually agree. [[User:Order]]
== '''Foreign Policy''' ==
== '''Foreign Policy''' ==