Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 65: Line 65:       −
::::I'm not sure whether or not that was intended as an insult but if it was it is completely unnecessary.  Whether or not this was written by a historian is irrelevant, poor encyclopedic writing is poor writing.  All it does is reflect the personal, and unsubstantiated, opinions of one person on a very broad subject.  Even if it were cited, the style of this featured article is poor.  Not being cited, I ask again for permission to amend the article to remain as strictly factual as possible.
+
::::I'm not sure whether or not that was intended as an insult but if it was it is completely unnecessary.  Whether or not this was written by a historian is irrelevant, poor encyclopedic writing is poor writing.  All it does is reflect the personal, and unsubstantiated, opinions of one person on a very broad subject.  Even if it were cited, the style of this featured article is poor.  Not being cited, I ask again for permission to amend the article in order that it remain as strictly factual as possible.
19

edits

Navigation menu