| Line 110: |
Line 110: |
| | ::Oh yes. sorry, i got it from the msn.com do i need promission to take photos from there? --[[User:StevenM|Ṣ₮ёVeN]] 14:03, 19 January 2009 (EST) | | ::Oh yes. sorry, i got it from the msn.com do i need promission to take photos from there? --[[User:StevenM|Ṣ₮ёVeN]] 14:03, 19 January 2009 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | + | == Obama/Muslim Support == |
| | | | |
| | + | In the May be a Muslim section, it says that he had an increased support of Muslim voters. How does this prove he is Muslim? While this should be kept, It should be moved to another section. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Nation of Islam's annual convention in a Chicago suburb, a white T-shirt with an image of Obama between Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. sold for $10. |
| | + | |
| | + | :The Muslim community supports their Muslims. MLK just thrown into the mix for his iconic black image. [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jGXLhxPilGxuVttW5L588O-y4uAAD96LKH200] |
| | | | |
| | == I know we lost a week... == | | == I know we lost a week... == |
| Line 146: |
Line 152: |
| | | | |
| | Wow. [[User:CherylE|CherylE]] 10:17, 28 January 2009 (EST) | | Wow. [[User:CherylE|CherylE]] 10:17, 28 January 2009 (EST) |
| − |
| |
| − | :I see two flaws in this discussion topic. The first is that Christianity is not mentioned in any quotations provided and only serves to convolute Conservapedia with Christianity. Conservapedia is an encyclopedia created to serve conservatives as a political and social group, not Christians as a religious group. Second is that the article is irrelevant because it does not differ from the status quo. Perhaps the his stance on evolution could be added to the sections regarding Obama's stance on religion or his stance on eduction but this does not deserve its own section.
| |
| | | | |
| | == Allegedly born in Honolulu == | | == Allegedly born in Honolulu == |
| Line 263: |
Line 267: |
| | I think "Obama will likely be the first Muslim President" would be better written as "Obama is likely the first Muslim President" ... just a thought [[User:NotALiberal|NotALiberal]] 22:08, 30 January 2009 (EST) | | I think "Obama will likely be the first Muslim President" would be better written as "Obama is likely the first Muslim President" ... just a thought [[User:NotALiberal|NotALiberal]] 22:08, 30 January 2009 (EST) |
| | :Nah, let's not. --[[User:VictorT|VictorT]] 17:47, 7 March 2009 (EST) | | :Nah, let's not. --[[User:VictorT|VictorT]] 17:47, 7 March 2009 (EST) |
| − | ::No, lets. The current "will likely" is a) ambiguous and b) points to him being a Muslim president in the future when the article claims he is one now. I support the proposed change.
| |
| | | | |
| | == Update picture? == | | == Update picture? == |