1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + +
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 21:32, May 6, 2009
, 21:32, May 6, 2009→NO
I can't believe this is a debate topic! Look to the upper left hand corner of this web page. See it? "Conservapedia, The Trustworthy Encyclopedia." Bias would not make it trustworthy or a good encyclopedia! Need I say more?--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 02:10, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
I can't believe this is a debate topic! Look to the upper left hand corner of this web page. See it? "Conservapedia, The Trustworthy Encyclopedia." Bias would not make it trustworthy or a good encyclopedia! Need I say more?--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 02:10, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
This whole website is just a way to influence others to be right-wing money grubbing people. What else would you expect from a website that calls itself "Conservapedia" and yet it's articles are apparently truthful. So far, any topic that I've typed in knowing as a touchy topic has been a hotbed of lies, taking quotes and pictures out of context. The only thing I'm worrying about is how much this is affecting the minds of open-minded children, turning them from being what-they-are to people who don't care for their fellow man and only money.
==Yes==
==Yes==