nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 515:
Line 515: + + + +
→Creationist Scientists - Oxymoron: redefining science and peer review
:Redefined 'science'? Um, mind giving any sources to demonstrate that? Cos at the moment, it seems as though you've just pulled that one from out of the air. [[User:Sureal|Sureal]] 06:18, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
:Redefined 'science'? Um, mind giving any sources to demonstrate that? Cos at the moment, it seems as though you've just pulled that one from out of the air. [[User:Sureal|Sureal]] 06:18, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
::"''Many today think that science is anti-God. Atheists encourage this view by claiming that their way of thinking is ‘scientific.’ In claiming this, they are merely redefining science to exclude God. In fact, science began to flourish only when the biblical view of creation took root in Europe as the Reformation spread its influence. The presuppositions that enabled a scientific approach to investigating the world—that the created universe is real, consistent, understandable, and possible to investigate, for example—came from the Bible. Even non-Christian historians of science such as Loren Eiseley have acknowledged this. Consequently, almost every branch of science was either founded, co-founded, or dramatically advanced, by scientists who believed in the Bible’s account of Creation and the Flood. And there are many scientists today who believe the Bible.''"[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3659] [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
:It might be due to the absence of any actual science. Tally up the number of actual scientific experiments and peer reviewed articles on [[Creation science]], and you'll see what I mean. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 06:20, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
:It might be due to the absence of any actual science. Tally up the number of actual scientific experiments and peer reviewed articles on [[Creation science]], and you'll see what I mean. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 06:20, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
::What about the "actual science" and the peer-reviewed articles in the ''CRS Quarterly'' and the ''Journal of Creation''? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)