nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
11,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: +
→Just to make sure: reply
It was my impression she was only recently aware of the "Constitution Conspiracy" claptrap. As she was adding references, but not changing the articles, I don't know if Avalerion was seeking a fight, or just reacting strongly as many do when stumbling across the nut cases who claim all of the Founding Fathers were engaged in some fantastic plot, no doubt directed by the Free Mason's or quite possibly the Illuminati! I asked Dean to reconsider the original blocking, RJ, based on nothing more than my belief they were not sinister. If you feel otherwise, please let me know, via email, and feel free to block the user. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:01, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
It was my impression she was only recently aware of the "Constitution Conspiracy" claptrap. As she was adding references, but not changing the articles, I don't know if Avalerion was seeking a fight, or just reacting strongly as many do when stumbling across the nut cases who claim all of the Founding Fathers were engaged in some fantastic plot, no doubt directed by the Free Mason's or quite possibly the Illuminati! I asked Dean to reconsider the original blocking, RJ, based on nothing more than my belief they were not sinister. If you feel otherwise, please let me know, via email, and feel free to block the user. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:01, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
:After seeing the commotion caused by Avalerion, I have reinstated the block. I didn't like her edits in the first place, and her recent comments to RJJensen are not appropriate. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 18:06, 11 May 2009 (EDT)