Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
state marriage laws
Line 7: Line 7:     
At the time, it was thought that the first effect was most important, and it appears first in the law.  Over ten years later, the second effect has emerged as most important, and in early 2009 a lawsuit was filed in [[Massachusetts]] to force the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages performed there.
 
At the time, it was thought that the first effect was most important, and it appears first in the law.  Over ten years later, the second effect has emerged as most important, and in early 2009 a lawsuit was filed in [[Massachusetts]] to force the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages performed there.
 +
 +
== State Marriage Laws ==
 +
 +
Thirty out of fifty states have constitutional provisions defining and limiting marriage as between a man and a woman.<ref>http://www.domawatch.com/stateissues/index.html</ref>  The states lacking protection of marriage in their constitutions are the thirteen northeastern states beginning with [[West Virginia]] (but not including Virginia), plus North Carolina on the East Coast; in the Midwest the states of Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois and Indiana, and in the West the states of Colorado, New Mexico and Washington.  As of May 12, 2009, five of those states had judicially declared or legislatively enacted same-sex marriage laws:  Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont and Maine.  In New Hampshire, the legislature passed same-sex marriage but the Governor has not yet received it for signature or a veto.
 +
    
== Text and Codification of Law ==
 
== Text and Codification of Law ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu