Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 236:
Line 236: − − AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Emphatic No. --[[User:Hitchens|Hitchens]] 21:12, 1 May 2009 (EDT) − − :No it cannot. You can thank God for that one. [[User:Deeer|Deeer]] 14:13, 13 May 2009 (EDT)
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 18:59, May 13, 2009
, 18:59, May 13, 2009no edit summary
Not likely. In this day and age, we will receive relentless ridicule and scourn from the mainstream media and other sources. Trust me, I've been on both sides of the issue. I am a former liberal and a former agnostic, although I was never cared much about politics until I became a conservative.--[[User:TedM|TedM]] 23:11, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
Not likely. In this day and age, we will receive relentless ridicule and scourn from the mainstream media and other sources. Trust me, I've been on both sides of the issue. I am a former liberal and a former agnostic, although I was never cared much about politics until I became a conservative.--[[User:TedM|TedM]] 23:11, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
I would agree
I would agree