Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 159: Line 159:     
:I could simply observe that your arrogance, in thinking that you are my judge, amazes me, and let it go at that. But I further observe that neither you nor anyone on your side has begun to think the matter through.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 21:44, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:I could simply observe that your arrogance, in thinking that you are my judge, amazes me, and let it go at that. But I further observe that neither you nor anyone on your side has begun to think the matter through.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 21:44, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Terry for your four points above
 +
::#The duty of care is ours by default, human race.  We are the only ones advance enough to cause change on a global scale.
 +
::#Our dereliction of duty is evident in that we avoid taking responsibility for our duty, keep polluting even though we know it is bad by claiming that there are other factors as well that add to the pollution.
 +
::#Displacement of species of animals, by changing the climate many animal species are moving to newer areas.  This is causing an increase in invasive species and choking out native species.
 +
::#The destruction of ice shelves, increased destruction of forests and the accelerated extinction of species.  Seems to be quiet a bit of damage.
 +
 +
What I can not understand is why so many people are so resistant to policies and guidelines that promote a healthy environment?  Are we that greedy that we are willing to continue to pollute and cause destruction of nature?
 +
 +
I saw Jerry Falwell on TV last night reporting against global warming.  How can any minister encourage the continuation of wasteful actions in regards to environmental resources?  I would think that anyone who is a man of god would cherish the creation of god and not work to destroy it.  Perhaps we should take some lessons from the Amish.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 10:04, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
    
Well Terry, I think you and yours are the ones who have not thought things through. Your arguments are based on the assumed full culpability of man for global warming. No one has made such an assertion. What has been stated in virtually every study on the evolution of the warming phenomenon is that carbon loading of the atmosphere, which has accelerated since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, tends to exacerbate and subsequently, accelerate the warming trend.
 
Well Terry, I think you and yours are the ones who have not thought things through. Your arguments are based on the assumed full culpability of man for global warming. No one has made such an assertion. What has been stated in virtually every study on the evolution of the warming phenomenon is that carbon loading of the atmosphere, which has accelerated since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, tends to exacerbate and subsequently, accelerate the warming trend.
686

edits

Navigation menu