Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎YEC theories: Qualified okay.
Line 173: Line 173:     
:It's not a view found in the organisations. Rather it's a theological opinion which is occassional formed by individuals. It's crops up on occassion, so I think we should mention it, but it shouldn't be called mainstream or common. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:It's not a view found in the organisations. Rather it's a theological opinion which is occassional formed by individuals. It's crops up on occassion, so I think we should mention it, but it shouldn't be called mainstream or common. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::As long as the qualifications that you put there are quite clear in the article, I guess I could go along with that.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:20, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
    
The linked references to the Creation Science section include on that mentions Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster in passing, so the mention of these in the article -- if this reference is retained -- don't seem to be entirely groundless.  Also, I would note that most of the articles cited are not themselves sources, but articles citing other articles (e.g. ''Romashko, “Tracking Dinosaurs,” Moscow News, No. 24, 1983, p. 10'', which does not seem to be available itself anywhere online, is the source for one of the referenced article's claim of human and dinosaur footprints being found together.  It should also be noted that the items referenced so far are general essays on pro-Creation and Christian websites.[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 16:59, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 
The linked references to the Creation Science section include on that mentions Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster in passing, so the mention of these in the article -- if this reference is retained -- don't seem to be entirely groundless.  Also, I would note that most of the articles cited are not themselves sources, but articles citing other articles (e.g. ''Romashko, “Tracking Dinosaurs,” Moscow News, No. 24, 1983, p. 10'', which does not seem to be available itself anywhere online, is the source for one of the referenced article's claim of human and dinosaur footprints being found together.  It should also be noted that the items referenced so far are general essays on pro-Creation and Christian websites.[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 16:59, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu