Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎A few more suggestions (one from 1700's): reply - not quite, but good suggestions
Line 325: Line 325:     
Aha!  What about "states' rights," circa 1790?  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 12:11, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
 
Aha!  What about "states' rights," circa 1790?  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 12:11, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
: "Republican" is a good suggestion, but the term is associated more with the Republican Party than with conservatism.  There are arguments that conservatism is populist in nature.  "Isms" are usually derogatory; missionary requires more discussion.
 +
 +
:"States rights" adds nothing conservative to "federalism", a 1789 term that we already include.  Liberals invokes "states rights" often also.
 +
 +
:I'll add all four terms as difficult to classify, pending further discussion.  Thanks but we're still looking for a a 1700s term to perfect the geometric fit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:38, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,911

edits

Navigation menu