Changes

I am assume you have good faith because it appears you wish to argue some things I do not understand why.  You go much beyond this article to say that it was not the image of Muhammed that cause offense. I do not know how to respond to religiously offended Muslim people across the world when the Danish newspaper public these pictures? Yes, I claim I am offended by images of the Prophet, more when one is casually put up on a website without explanation of the context with a statement that there is a debate whether images of the Prophet are prohibited! No Muslim person believes this. It is Islamic law. Many may not observe this law. It does not make it any less the Law of God, who has willed it. I wrote here 2 major groups of Muslim people believe there is a Qu'ranic prohibition on any images of the Prophet or other major prophets and God, Blessed be He. I gave reference to the ayat of the Qu'ran and Words of the Prophet to show why Muslim people people these things.  How could I know whether this image look anything like Muhammed? I do not. It is not a photograph of the Prophet holding his motor vehicle operator license. It is representation art I know it is intended to be an image of Muhammed, just as you know images of Jesus and Christian saints are intended to be such things. It is clear from the context. To answer your last question again I find any image of the Prophet to be against the Laws of God, for God has willed it. Good day. Rafi

I am assume you have good faith because it appears you wish to argue some things I do not understand why.  You go much beyond this article to say that it was not the image of Muhammed that cause offense. I do not know how to respond to religiously offended Muslim people across the world when the Danish newspaper public these pictures? Yes, I claim I am offended by images of the Prophet, more when one is casually put up on a website without explanation of the context with a statement that there is a debate whether images of the Prophet are prohibited! No Muslim person believes this. It is Islamic law. Many may not observe this law. It does not make it any less the Law of God, who has willed it. I wrote here 2 major groups of Muslim people believe there is a Qu'ranic prohibition on any images of the Prophet or other major prophets and God, Blessed be He. I gave reference to the ayat of the Qu'ran and Words of the Prophet to show why Muslim people people these things.  How could I know whether this image look anything like Muhammed? I do not. It is not a photograph of the Prophet holding his motor vehicle operator license. It is representation art I know it is intended to be an image of Muhammed, just as you know images of Jesus and Christian saints are intended to be such things. It is clear from the context. To answer your last question again I find any image of the Prophet to be against the Laws of God, for God has willed it. Good day. Rafi