13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
→Final warning....: response
You are certainly busy, Geosis. However fair warning about inserting, or debating, or asking for relativist information to be inserted: It will not fly here. For "facts" of that kind, might I suggest Wikipedia? But here at Conservapedia moral equivelancy that liberals try to inject into arguments, such as Black/Gay is rejected. Totally. Perhaps I am just misunderstanding the semantics of it all, your thinking. Perhaps not... --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:30, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
You are certainly busy, Geosis. However fair warning about inserting, or debating, or asking for relativist information to be inserted: It will not fly here. For "facts" of that kind, might I suggest Wikipedia? But here at Conservapedia moral equivelancy that liberals try to inject into arguments, such as Black/Gay is rejected. Totally. Perhaps I am just misunderstanding the semantics of it all, your thinking. Perhaps not... --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:30, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
:I understand where you're coming from on the "homosexuality is a choice" issue, and I think you might want to re-read the comment I left on Ed Poor's talk page. I was acknowledging that as part of the premise of the argument before making a suggestion on how to improve the argument. As I stated, "Both lifestyles [Homosexuality and Judaism] are choices and both groups have been persecuted for their lifestyles." --[[User:Gnosis|Gnosis]] 13:34, 20 May 2009 (EDT)