Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
6,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
==Wording==
==Wording==
You were correct to state it is not the classic "missing link", I think new "missing link" should be removed because it suggests a part of the human to ape question has been found, when it hasn't. "Claimed possibly to an ancestor of primates, including humans." This needs liberal wording and should be reworded as such "evolutionists claim it is the ancestor of primates, which they believe is the ancestor of humans."--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:33, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
You were correct to state it is not the classic "missing link", I think new "missing link" should be removed because it suggests a part of the human to ape question has been found, when it hasn't. "Claimed possibly to an ancestor of primates, including humans." This needs liberal wording and should be reworded as such "evolutionists claim it is the ancestor of primates, which they believe is the ancestor of humans."--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:33, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
:Good on the missing link. I was going to tweak some wording a little too. Thanks. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 22:36, 20 May 2009 (EDT)