Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,852
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 434:
Line 434: +
rsponse to TK
*Yes, <s>Conservative</s>, errr, Rob, I hear you. Could you be so kind as to bold what the heck passage you are saying is going to be re-inserted unless proof to your personal satisfaction is provided?
*Yes, <s>Conservative</s>, errr, Rob, I hear you. Could you be so kind as to bold what the heck passage you are saying is going to be re-inserted unless proof to your personal satisfaction is provided?
That was very poor humor. Just frustrated, because the amount of material and posts, makes me lose track. The argument is lost in all the hundreds of posts and documentation, the focus, for me, is lost. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:52, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
That was very poor humor. Just frustrated, because the amount of material and posts, makes me lose track. The argument is lost in all the hundreds of posts and documentation, the focus, for me, is lost. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:52, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
:* Here. [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Liberal#Disputed_text] The Wikipedia technique of talking a matter to death don't work here. That's what conservativism is--not losing focus of one's values and views. Might I suggest the shifting sand of so-called "liberalism" is based upon moods, emotion, fads, fashion, and fancy, hence the difficulting of nailing down what its fundemental core principals are? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:19, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
== Internal consistency ==
== Internal consistency ==