Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
539 bytes added ,  23:19, May 22, 2009
m
Line 771: Line 771:  
::*Maybe. <!-- Was giving you a chance to WIGO my first answer. --> I'm still trying to figure out why this is such an issue to a student in Austria, as well as the 2010 Census, unless they are merely trolling. Moore is a propagandist, a socialist one, who uses lies to distort other's opinions, or the quality of Cuban health care. that makes him deceitful. Cafferty, did you look at the links and do your own research?  Or did you just visit the Daily Kos? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:47, 22 May 2009 (EDT)
 
::*Maybe. <!-- Was giving you a chance to WIGO my first answer. --> I'm still trying to figure out why this is such an issue to a student in Austria, as well as the 2010 Census, unless they are merely trolling. Moore is a propagandist, a socialist one, who uses lies to distort other's opinions, or the quality of Cuban health care. that makes him deceitful. Cafferty, did you look at the links and do your own research?  Or did you just visit the Daily Kos? --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:47, 22 May 2009 (EDT)
   −
:::I read all of the links in the article <!-- and FYI, I never read Daily Kos, Huffington Post, or Drudge for that matter. -->. Did you read the beginning of my post? I'm completely in agreement that Michael Moore uses deceit and poor logic in his filmmaking. But by definition, the example in this article is of hypocrisy, not deceit.
+
:::I read all of the links in the article<!-- and FYI, I never read Daily Kos, Huffington Post, or Drudge for that matter. -->. Did you read the beginning of my post? I'm completely in agreement that Michael Moore uses deceit and poor logic in his filmmaking. But by definition, the example in this article is of hypocrisy, not deceit.
   −
:::As for the Cafferty, how is reading only mail critical of Limbaugh an example of deceit? Like I said in the original post, it's definitely [[liberal bias]], [[liberal style]], and general nasty behavior, but doesn't match the other examples. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 19:05, 22 May 2009 (EDT)
+
:::As for the Cafferty, how is reading only mail critical of Limbaugh an example of deceit? Like I said in the original post, it's definitely [[liberal bias]], [[liberal style]], and general nasty behavior, but doesn't match the other examples.
 +
<!--BTW, your recent edit to the article added a mistake. See http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/GRAMMAR/plurals.htm: "When a family name (a proper noun) is pluralized, we almost always simply add an "s." So we go to visit the Smiths, the Kennedys, the Grays, etc.When a family name ends in s, x, ch, sh, or z, however, we form the plural by added -es, as in the Marches, the Joneses, the Maddoxes, the Bushes, the Rodriguezes. Do not form a family name plural by using an apostrophe; that device is reserved for creating possessive forms."--> [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 19:05, 22 May 2009 (EDT)
1,266

edits

Navigation menu