Changes

:::As for the Cafferty, how is reading only mail critical of Limbaugh an example of deceit? Like I said in the original post, it's definitely [[liberal bias]], [[liberal style]], and general nasty behavior, but doesn't match the other examples.

:::As for the Cafferty, how is reading only mail critical of Limbaugh an example of deceit? Like I said in the original post, it's definitely [[liberal bias]], [[liberal style]], and general nasty behavior, but doesn't match the other examples.

<!--BTW, your recent edit to the article added a mistake. See http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/GRAMMAR/plurals.htm: "When a family name (a proper noun) is pluralized, we almost always simply add an "s." So we go to visit the Smiths, the Kennedys, the Grays, etc.When a family name ends in s, x, ch, sh, or z, however, we form the plural by added -es, as in the Marches, the Joneses, the Maddoxes, the Bushes, the Rodriguezes. Do not form a family name plural by using an apostrophe; that device is reserved for creating possessive forms."--> [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 19:20, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

<!--BTW, your recent edit to the article added a mistake. See http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/GRAMMAR/plurals.htm: "When a family name (a proper noun) is pluralized, we almost always simply add an "s." So we go to visit the Smiths, the Kennedys, the Grays, etc.When a family name ends in s, x, ch, sh, or z, however, we form the plural by added -es, as in the Marches, the Joneses, the Maddoxes, the Bushes, the Rodriguezes. Do not form a family name plural by using an apostrophe; that device is reserved for creating possessive forms."-->  

[[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 19:20, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

::::Perhaps the best solution, then, is to suggest some better examples of deceit by Moore and Cafferty.  If they do a better job of illustrating how dishonest they are, I'm sure nobody will object to adding them to the article.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 20:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

::::Perhaps the best solution, then, is to suggest some better examples of deceit by Moore and Cafferty.  If they do a better job of illustrating how dishonest they are, I'm sure nobody will object to adding them to the article.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 20:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Yes, Ben, that is indeed what I am used to, rather than a picky debate over what constitutes a better reference, if an editor has a problem, find a better one!  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 20:20, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Yes, Ben, that is indeed what I am used to, rather than a picky debate over what constitutes a better reference, if an editor has a problem, find a better one!  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 20:20, 22 May 2009 (EDT)