Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,673
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 703:
Line 703: + +
→Encyclopedic Setup?: reply
:Derek, forget-about-it if you think you're going to dilute the entry with Wikipedia-style [[placement bias]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:22, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
:Derek, forget-about-it if you think you're going to dilute the entry with Wikipedia-style [[placement bias]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:22, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
::ok, I'll Try. Before I start, if i make such an article and you deem it full of placement bias, will I suffer negative side affects? Because I would rather avoid nefativityt period. If that makes any sense[[User:DerekSmalls|DerekSmalls]] 18:50, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
::ok, I'll Try. Before I start, if i make such an article and you deem it full of placement bias, will I suffer negative side affects? Because I would rather avoid nefativityt period. If that makes any sense[[User:DerekSmalls|DerekSmalls]] 18:50, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
::: "effects", not "affects". We are logical here. If your proposed substitute is separate from the entry and does not vandalize it, and is not vulgar or otherwise obviously inappropriate, then there will be no negative side effects. So feel free to make encyclopedic suggestions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:48, 25 May 2009 (EDT)