Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: − ===Terminology=== − An analysis of Sonia Sotomayor's decisions shows that she sometimes uses Conservative words, such as the following: − *'''strict constructionist''' ''New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council v. Hotel Ass'n,'' 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16615 (1993) − − *'''judicial restraint''' "venerable ground of judicial restraint" in ''Michel v. INS,'' 206 F.3d 253, 267 (2000) − − *'''competition''' (in an economic context) Many cases. − − *'''efficiency''' ''Singh v. City of New York'', 524 F.3d 361 (2d Cir. 2008) − − *'''free-market''' ''Silverman v. Major League Baseball Player Relations Comm.,'' 880 F. Supp. 246, 256 (1995) − − *'''separation of powers''' ''European Cmty. v. RJR Nabisco,'' 424 F.3d 175 (2005) − − *'''transaction cost'''' ''Calif. Pub. Emples.' Ret. Sys. v. N.Y. Stock Exch., Inc.'' (In re NYSE Specialists Sec. Litig.), 503 F.3d 89, 94 (2007)
remove section which implies she is conservative, because I've heard she's an arch-liberal
Decisions by Sotomayor, such as Taylor v. Vt. Dept of Ed. 313 F.3d 768 (2002), seem to show that she favors [[judicial restraint]] with respect to standing issues.
Decisions by Sotomayor, such as Taylor v. Vt. Dept of Ed. 313 F.3d 768 (2002), seem to show that she favors [[judicial restraint]] with respect to standing issues.
==Issues==
==Issues==