| | The use of the term ''[[homosexuality]]'' in the study of ancient sexuality has found some dissatisfaction, due to the lack of a specific term in ancient literature corresponding to the modern concept of persons who are consistently sexually attracted to their own gender, versus the opposite sex. However, ancient literature refers to those who by their actions seem to have manifested such, especially as regards the male who played the female partner.<ref>Aristotle, "Problemata," 4.26; 879b-880a</ref> The primary moral authority on the subject, the Bible, does not explicitly refer to homosexual inclination, though it is reasonable to believe that the word ''malakos'', translated ''effeminate'' (1Cor. 6:9) in the [[KJV]] may denote homosexual ''orientation.'' In contrast to modern times however, to be the effeminate partner was considered shameful for a man.<ref>Homosexuality and the Ancient Greeks, ReligionFacts.com</ref> The lack of terms in the Bible for certain behaviors which correspond to modern psychological diagnostics may also be explained as being due to the fact that the Bible does not justify inherently unlawful actions even if one has an inner inclination to do them, but calls and enables victory over such. (Gn. 4:7; Col. 3:5-8) | | The use of the term ''[[homosexuality]]'' in the study of ancient sexuality has found some dissatisfaction, due to the lack of a specific term in ancient literature corresponding to the modern concept of persons who are consistently sexually attracted to their own gender, versus the opposite sex. However, ancient literature refers to those who by their actions seem to have manifested such, especially as regards the male who played the female partner.<ref>Aristotle, "Problemata," 4.26; 879b-880a</ref> The primary moral authority on the subject, the Bible, does not explicitly refer to homosexual inclination, though it is reasonable to believe that the word ''malakos'', translated ''effeminate'' (1Cor. 6:9) in the [[KJV]] may denote homosexual ''orientation.'' In contrast to modern times however, to be the effeminate partner was considered shameful for a man.<ref>Homosexuality and the Ancient Greeks, ReligionFacts.com</ref> The lack of terms in the Bible for certain behaviors which correspond to modern psychological diagnostics may also be explained as being due to the fact that the Bible does not justify inherently unlawful actions even if one has an inner inclination to do them, but calls and enables victory over such. (Gn. 4:7; Col. 3:5-8) |