Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Sources?: new section
Line 163: Line 163:     
Why?  All the other articles I've seen have references at regular text size.  What's particular about this article that it needs to have really tiny footnotes?  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 17:24, 28 October 2008 (EDT)
 
Why?  All the other articles I've seen have references at regular text size.  What's particular about this article that it needs to have really tiny footnotes?  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 17:24, 28 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Sources? ==
 +
 +
So I was reading the page, and I clicked one of the sources (#4). I checked the link out, and it makes a claim that the article it quotes "appeared in Guide Magazine, a homosexual publication, in November 1987." I looked up Guide Magazine, and I was surprised to find that it was not only ''not'' a homosexual publication, but in fact a ''Christian'' magazine, owned by what seems to be a Seventh-Day Adventist group. This might explain the article--I could see this much more easily as a smear than a real pro-gay piece.
 +
 +
Here's the source I mentioned:
 +
http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/overhauling.htm
 +
And here's the source ''it'' mentions, Guide Magazine.
 +
http://www.guidemagazine.org/aboutguide/
 +
 +
Just wanted to let you know. Thanks for the consideration.
 +
-C
5

edits

Navigation menu