1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Conservapedia's Law (view source)
Revision as of 02:32, June 10, 2009
, 02:32, June 10, 2009Foole me once...
While this an interesting entry, I think it needs some clarification. I'm not entirely sure what the argument is and I think if it included some sources to back up its claims, it would be a strong essay. Furthermore, the one assertion that societies will inevitably adopt conservative ideologies needs to be backed up with sources and examples. Looking historically, we can see liberal ideologies and policies becoming much more prominent in many societies, such as environmental movements, same-sex marriage rights, gun control and so on. So if things are to continue in this way, wouldn't that point to societies becoming more liberal in the future? I think these issues could be cleared up with more clarification and more support. - Cjohnston.
While this an interesting entry, I think it needs some clarification. I'm not entirely sure what the argument is and I think if it included some sources to back up its claims, it would be a strong essay. Furthermore, the one assertion that societies will inevitably adopt conservative ideologies needs to be backed up with sources and examples. Looking historically, we can see liberal ideologies and policies becoming much more prominent in many societies, such as environmental movements, same-sex marriage rights, gun control and so on. So if things are to continue in this way, wouldn't that point to societies becoming more liberal in the future? I think these issues could be cleared up with more clarification and more support. - Cjohnston.
==Essay?==
This is not so much an essay as it is the undocumented ramblings of the site owner.
While it '''his''' right to put whatever notion that may bubble up through his consciousness, trying to dignify his musings by couching it as an "essay" stretches the meaning pretty thin.
The "law" isn't even proffered in a way that one can garner its meaning: "'''Conservapedia's Law''' is the observation that [[conservative]] insights increase over time at a geometric rate, as in 1-2-4-8-16-etc."
If this were a true law then would not '''all''' insights be "conservative" at some given point?
When (exactly) did the use of conservative insights begin?
Please, please, please, Andy...run for office again, I'm sure the voters of New Jersey could use a good Schlaughly. [[User:JodyP|JodyP]] 22:32, 9 June 2009 (EDT)