Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
6,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 431:
Line 431: + + +
question- rejection of evolution conserative position?
Federalism doesn't necessarily refer to the idea that the states should retain more power than the federal government, only to the notion that the states and national government can coexist as sovereign entities with supremacy over their respective domains. "Federalism" ought to be changed to "states' rights" or "limited government." --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 18:16, 23 May 2009 (EDT)
Federalism doesn't necessarily refer to the idea that the states should retain more power than the federal government, only to the notion that the states and national government can coexist as sovereign entities with supremacy over their respective domains. "Federalism" ought to be changed to "states' rights" or "limited government." --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 18:16, 23 May 2009 (EDT)
==Junk science==
Evolution may be bad science, but I'm not sure that rejecting it should be in a list of what conservatives support. Perhaps a second list of "''may also'' support would be good for this and a couple of others. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:56, 10 June 2009 (EDT)