4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Conservapedia's Law (view source)
Revision as of 12:05, June 12, 2009
, 12:05, June 12, 2009no edit summary
:I didn't revert it, but I see why it was reverted. You introduced unhelpful complexity to a simple analogy. Your edit obscured rather than clarified, and earned a reversion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:41, 9 June 2009 (EDT)
:I didn't revert it, but I see why it was reverted. You introduced unhelpful complexity to a simple analogy. Your edit obscured rather than clarified, and earned a reversion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:41, 9 June 2009 (EDT)
== Essay? ==
Do you mind if I ask what "Essay:X" means? I just saw a page similar to this which had no "Essay:" in the title, so I'm wondering if this page has been misnamed and the essay part should be taken out. --[[User:RobbieKray|RobbieKray]] 08:05, 12 June 2009 (EDT)