15
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: +
Talk:Essay:Conservapedia's Law (view source)
Revision as of 17:11, June 13, 2009
, 17:11, June 13, 2009no edit summary
::: Are you saying there are no legitimate new conservative words? If you concede there are some, then it's possible to estimate their rate of increase, which we've done. If you insist there are none, then you lack the open-mind you claim to have.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:51, 12 June 2009 (EDT)
::: Are you saying there are no legitimate new conservative words? If you concede there are some, then it's possible to estimate their rate of increase, which we've done. If you insist there are none, then you lack the open-mind you claim to have.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:51, 12 June 2009 (EDT)
::::I do not deny there are no new legitimate conservative words, just that some you list are not legitimate, which may interfere with your geometric rate of increase argument. But I will reiterate my concerns a final time using as few words as possible: Your argument is weak and lacks clarification and support. - Cjohnston
== Did I do something wrong? ==
== Did I do something wrong? ==